| Recent Films | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| A selection of film stills and critiques
by Katherine Araniello |
|||
| Sick
2008 (4 minutes 7 seconds) |
This
piece is about the distinction between being sick and being disabled and
the false conflation of the two.
I was reminded of this when I watched a television programme where they
were discussing the inclusion of 'fit & healthy' contestants who are
not very thin entering a Miss World contest. So I started to think about
the idea of 'fit & healthy' and how that relates to role models and
disability. I was reminded of the fact that many people associate disability
with illness and I wanted to make a work addressing this. |
Watch
the Film |
|
| The
Interview 2008 (13 minutes 4 seconds) |
The
piece is a mockery -- send up of those hideous trashy morning mainstream
radio programmes that churn out balderdash -- and become a recognizable
drone in the background. However in my radio interview if the listener does actually tune in -- they will be lured into a mixture of joviality contrasted with dark subversive humour. This artwork
was inspired from my experience of being invited to participate in a live
radio interview to do with art and disability issues. The Interview was aired in May 2007 on Bob & Roberta Smith's radio programme 'Make Your Own Damn Music'. |
|
|
The
Interview June 2005 |
I was one of
the artists selected to speak at the Common Sense conference (a gathering
of contemporary disabled artists who presented and discussed their work).
In response I presented a video in which I am interviewed about my work
by an image conscious girl in pink, (Daddy got her the job, you know how
it works…) All the stereotypes are intact as the interviewer preens
herself in the monitor, checking her image, saying yes and no - she hopes
in the right place. She pretends to listen to my answers to her increasingly
banal and offensive questions. Although the piece is humorous to watch
and tongue in cheek, there are serious implications for disabled artists,
commenting on the media’s refusal to take artists with disabilities
seriously. Finally the interviewer asks “You don't have hope?”! |
|
|
Pop
Video 'I Like That' July 2004 (4 minutes 22 seconds) |
In
this video I have reconstructed myself within the parameters of a pop
video. I do not aspire to be the next Madonna or Britney Spears but making
the pop video for me was an opportunity to prove that it was possible
to use myself (someone who is physically opposite to the majority perception
of a physically aesthetic attractive mobile body) in a pop video. It was
important not to model myself on existing divas but to create an individual
persona that could be integrated with my own physicality and the dance
track.
The video is a parody of the current
sexed-up pop industry, using myself and an anorexic armless mannequin
to fill the screen against a bold vibrant backdrop. |
Video
Clip 1 Video Clip 2 |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
| Jennifer |
The
video “Jennifer” is based on the tragic representation of
disability that we are constantly reminded of from media representation.
I have used this as a starting point to produce “Jennifer”
an androgynous looking woman who uses an electric wheelchair but also
walks around. Jennifer is represented in the banal activity of feeding
the ducks. It is ambiguous for the viewer as to whether or not she really
is disabled and it is left to the viewer to decide that. The peaceful
surroundings of the film present an idyllic tranquil setting which corresponds
well with the leisurely pace of the editing. There is no spoken narrative
instead the story is told by Jennifer’s actions and the movement
of the camera. Tragic soundtrack accompanies Jennifer. Some of the music
is taken from films to enhance the sorrowful moment whilst one track is
a song by Donovan that has been edited to enhance its lyrics “Jennifer…longs
for what she lacks”. “Jennifer” questions our need to
stereotype others by juxtaposing a cocktail of social issues such as disability,
difference, gender identity and normality. |
||
| Shoot
Jan 2004, (1 minute 20 seconds) |
Shoot and Jennifer
run together in a loop. Shoot uses the same aesthetics as Jennifer which
results in a fast-paced digital montage. The flashing photography of individual
images presents a glamorous representation of a shiny commercially viable
product. On closer inspection the shiny metal and curved contours of the
product may not represent what one might expect.
|
![]()
|
|
| home | |||